This Nike Thing: They Didn't Have A Choice
No politics, no emotions. Let’s strip away all the dust-up
over the Nike-Colin Kaepernick ad and look at what really happened – and why it
had to happen to try to reboot the Nike brand.
Nike isn’t on the verge of going out of business, far from
it, but the brand is getting stale. As young people, the primary wearer of
athletic shoes, get older and stop living in athletic shoes, brands have to reintroduce
themselves to a new generation. It’s a cycle. Walk through a high school
hallway right now and you’ll see brands like Adidas and Puma riding high like
it’s the 70s again. Nike is the “old” brand.
Nike needed an Old Spice moment.
Old Spice was a dying brand until a few years ago when they delivered
a shocking, bizarre ad campaign that made it cool for young men to wear Old
Spice. The gamble was that those young men would continue to use Old Spice
products for the next 20 years. It was a huge win.
I wasn’t in the Nike meeting, but I’ve been in plenty of
similar ones. Nike did an Apollo 13. They looked at their problem and what
tools they had on hand to fix it.
Here’s what they were looking at:
-
The brand is struggling with the younger
demographic they desperately need to capture and keep for the next 20 years.
-
Research tells them this audience (younger
Millennials aged 15-25) feels good about brands and people who take a stand on
issues. Especially an anti-establishment stand. (Yes, Millennials are Boomers
2.0, but we’ll save that for another article.)
-
Colin Kaepernick, the face of an
anti-establishment movement, was already on retainer.
The only question was when to launch. To use Colin
Kaepernick, you would have to package it around the NFL season, but at what
point? Launch at the beginning of training camp and you have the entire back to
school shopping season ahead of you, but you run the risk of getting lost in
the malaise of the NFL preseason. Launch at the beginning of the playoffs to
take advantage of holiday shopping and you run the risk of dealing with Colin
K’s declining relevance sinking to Tim Tebow levels.
The time was now.
Nike certainly knew the risks and rewards and I would assume
the first few days went mostly according to plan. The stock took a
multi-billion dollar hit (probably temporary) and the very inexpensive ad
garnered tens of millions in media value. That doesn’t include the gazillions of
impressions, positive and negative, generated by the social media explosion. (And
I could be convinced that the negative social media impressions were the more
valuable ones.)
Questions remain. The negative backlash was anticipated, but
did Nike land the message with the audience they so desperately need? Will this
translate to purchase intent? And will the moms and dads of those young purchase
intenders be okay with forking over the credit card to seal the deal?
Some would like to call this whole thing a stunt. Okay,
let’s say it is. IHOP’s recent name change stunt delivered a 4x increase in
their hamburger sales and opened up a new daypart for their business.
Nike is a veteran of the brand reinvention wars. Moving from
being the running shoe people to the amateur athlete people to the
crosstraining people to the basketball people to the athleisure fashion people.
Let’s see if they can pull another trick out of the marketing hat.

Comments
Post a Comment